Furthermore, the voice behind his reflections on the German soul is transparently that of Thomas Mann, who provides Zeitblom with what are too obviously hindsights about the conclusion of the war.
Finally, what could be more farfetched than a middle-European provincial’s reference to occupied Paris as a “Luna Park” for New Order Germans?
If you are already a subscriber, please be sure you are logged in to your account.
Goethe’s Faust presents us with a competent world view. It presents man in the guise of faust as a social animal whose actions have deeper ramifications on those around him. Faust’s actions are the catalyst that lead to the downfall of his fellow characters, Gretchen, Valenitne, and Gretchens mother.
” In a German context the Faust tale, and especially Gothe’s Faust, is too great to be left alone and becomes automatically hijacked and adapted to suit the true history which is written by none other than the victorious.
The comparison of the Wiemar Faust part one and the Dieter Dorn production clearly reveals the gaping chasam of possible interpretation.
The dual nature of the pact Faust makes with Mephistopheles in Fausts study and the bet which is made between the Lord and Mephistopheles in the prologue in Heaven.  Goethe’s view of Evil (167)  Geza von Molnar The English Goethe Society(51)  ibid.
Goethe’s Faust raises constant questions concerning good and evil, causality and predetermination.
Goethe’s Faust is taken under the umbrella of western capitalism and eastern socialism and the result is two radically different plays which use the same text. Sources of the Faust tradition from Simon Magus to Lessing.
The Weimar production presents Faust as social hero and the Dieter Dorn production presents Faust as a social reprobate. I will attempt to reach the source of this ambiguity which allows such radical interpretation by concentrating my reading on the pact made between the Lord and Mephisto and the Pact made between Faust and Mephistopheles.