But it has the added layer of being televised for mass consumption.
The jokes need to play off of the celebrities in the room, while also being applicable enough to cater the general public.
The crucial part of Baudelaire’s essay, however, turns on his distinction between the comic and the grotesque.
The comic, he says, is an imitation mixed with a certain creative faculty, and the grotesque is a creation mixed with a certain imitative faculty—imitative of elements found in nature.
Bergson traces the implications of this view in the sundry elements of comedy: situations, language, characters.
Henri Bergson Essay On Comedy Cover Letter For Pharmacy Internship
Comedy expresses a lack of adaptability to society; any individual is comic who goes his own way without troubling to get into touch with his fellow beings.In terms of emotion, ethos is viewed as a permanent condition characteristic of the average person and relatively mild in its nature; pathos, on the other hand, is a temporary emotional state, often violent.Comedy thus expresses human character in the ordinary circumstances of everyday life, and tragedy expresses the sufferings of a particular individual in extraordinary periods of intense emotion.Each gives rise to laughter expressive of an idea of superiority—in the comic, the superiority of man over man and, in the grotesque, the superiority of man over nature.The laughter caused by the grotesque has about it something more profound and primitive, something much closer to the innocent life, than has the laughter caused by the comic in human behaviour.Since the humours governed temperament, an irregular distribution of them was considered to result not only in bodily sickness but also in derangements of personality and behaviour, as well. Folly need only be observed and imitated by the comic dramatist to give rise to laughter.Observers as early as Quintilian, however, have pointed out that, though folly is laughable in itself, such jests may be improved if the writer adds something of his own—namely, wit.Aristophanic comedy sought its laughable quality not so much in the imitation of a person as in the representation of “some odd conceit which had commonly somewhat of unnatural or obscene in it.” In the so-called , noted that ethos is akin to comedy and pathos to tragedy.The distinction is important to Renaissance and Neoclassical assumptions concerning the respective subject of comic and tragic representation.The audience is mostly made up of Hollywood’s truest elite, while honoring their achievements in the entertainment industry for the year.So in some ways, this event needs to appeal to only this very small crowd and no one else.