In short, an academic research paper and a literature review contain some of the same elements.
In fact, many academic research papers will contain a literature review section.
They can also exist as part of a larger work or stand on their own.
The two types of literature reviews commonly found in journals are those introducing research articles (studies and surveys) and stand-alone literature analyses.
The contents of a literature review are determined by many factors, including its precise purpose in the document, the degree of consensus with a given theory or tension between competing theories, the length of the article, the amount of previous studies existing in the given field, etc.
The following are some of the most important elements that a literature provides.You don’t need to cut each piece by yourself from scratch.Rather, you can take the pieces that other researchers have “cut” and put them together to build a framework on which to hang your own “books”—that is, your own study methods, results, and conclusions.They can differ in their scope, length, and specific purpose.The literature review found at the beginning of a journal article is used to introduce research related to the specific study and is found in the Introduction section, usually near the end.Literature reviews can differ in structure, length, and amount and breadth of content included.They can range from the selective (a very narrow area of research or only a single work) to the comprehensive (a larger amount or range of works).And depending on the situation, the literature review may evaluate the sources and advise the reader on the most pertinent or relevant.While the main focus of an academic research paper is to support your own argument, the focus of a literature review is to summarize and synthesize the arguments and ideas of others.It might give a new interpretation of old material or combine new with old interpretations.Or it might trace the intellectual progression of the field, including major debates.