Just the same, while the storytelling sags a little as enters into its final stretch, it succeeds as the first of Scorsese’s grand, disturbing, music-infused crescendos, a lethal ambush scored to panicked automotive noise and Eric Clapton/Johnny Mayall and the Bluesbreakers’ “Steppin’ Out.” If, ultimately, the math doesn’t exactly add up, is rife with out-of-focus shots and camerawork that struggles for detail in light-deprived spaces, while the editing is, to put it mildly, rarely on par with what Thelma Schoonmaker would eventually bring to her career-spanning collaboration with Martin Scorsese.
The audio on Warner’s Blu-ray is presented in a lean, undemanding, but satisfying DTS-HD 1.0 track.
The commentary track is a patchwork of voices talking over selected scenes.
The audience can feel the restricted rage in Jake as he struggles to come to terms with himself.
"Raging Bull" is one of those films that is very close to "Citizen Kane".
Nevertheless, the spectacular camerawork links to the emotional thrust of the story.
And the violence is never more conspicuous than when De Niro and the camera are at rest in a domestic setting.They both deal with men who desperately want to be great, but ultimately destroy themselves and those around them.By the end, La Motta declares that he "Could have been a contender....", quoting Marlon Brando's famous line from On the Waterfront. Introduction Assignment: Critical analysis of a film Raging bull by Martin Scorsese Raging Bull by Martin Scorsese is now considered as a cinematic masterpiece.Ironically at the time it was made, Scorsese was as bewildered as it is possible, without actually climbing in the ring, having barely survived a distressing and violent period with cocaine and having being criticised heavily for his former New York, New York.First, the two films dedicate long passages to Hawksian, just-hanging-out business, as much inspired by Scorsese’s Little Italy remembrances as the profound tonal influence of John Cassavetes’s seminal 1959 film, , Scorsese has both delighted in, and recognized the occasionally brutal ferocity of, what happens when some dumb, headstrong guys get a few drinks in them, and one of them decides that somebody made a crack about somebody’s mother, or something.The second connective thread is, of course, the Catholic guilt/Madonna-whore business, enmeshed in the mildly melancholic self-loathing of a poor sap who can’t respect a girl who’d stoop so low as to sleep with him.that was matched only by the one Barack Obama received, was not only no stranger to remakes, but took up the business of remaking, rebooting, and paying homage as a more than honorable foundation for a now-legendary body of work., the director’s third feature, the one that really drove the backhoe into the vacant lot that would eventually become the tower we call Scorsese, was itself something of a do-over, of his 1967 debut feature, Genealogical signposts consist largely of two elements.Although he loses five of his six fights with Sugar Ray Robinson, who is often acknowledged as the world's greatest boxer.Jake's leading antagonist over the years was not Robinson, but his own self-destructive nature.